top of page

(NSW) Prohibit Consent-Based Strip Searches

  • Luca Lenarduzzi, Kirsty Umback, Meaghan Kearney, Noah Star, Bianca-Rose Sun, Eren Olmez & Amrita Chahal
  • May 30
  • 9 min read

Author: Luca Lenarduzzi, Kirsty Umback, Meaghan Kearney, Noah Star, Bianca-Rose Sun, Eren Olmez & Amrita Chahal | Publish date: 30/5/2026


Content Warning: Police intimidation, strip searches and degrading treatment.


  • P: In NSW, police can conduct strip searches even when the legal criteria for a strip search are not adequately met, provided that individual consent was given. 

  • S: The NSW Attorney General should amend Section 29(2)(b) of the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW) to remove consent as a justification for strip searches. 

  • Redfern Legal Centre (RLC): ‘Strip searches should not be able to be carried out by consent. The law should be amended so that police must in all cases be able to justify a strip search in accordance with the legal criteria.’


Problem Identification: 

Section 29(2)(b) of the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW) (LEPRA) permits police to seek an individual’s consent to conduct a strip search. However, Community Legal Centres NSW (CLC), noted that under LEPRA, the legal threshold for a strip search is met ‘when the officer suspects on reasonable grounds that circumstances make a strip search “necessary”, “serious” and “urgent”. But the legislation fails to provide any guidance as to what these terms mean.’


According to a 2019 Report by Dr Grewcock and Dr Sentas from University of New South Wales Law (UNSW Report), strip searches are ‘coercive’ by nature, especially where consent is sought to bypass legal thresholds. RLC Solicitor, Samantha Lee, argued that ‘the high numbers of strip searches in NSW indicate police are failing to meet legal thresholds and the law is failing to provide much needed safeguards.’


Context: 

Under LEPRA, strip searches refer to a ‘search of a person or of articles in the possession of a person that may include … requiring the person to remove all of his or her clothes, and … an examination of the person's body … and of those clothes.’ According to Community Legal Centres NSW (CLC) ‘police … [also] have the power to strip search children between the ages of 10 and 18.’ This means that children ‘can be subjected to a full body strip search, and in some circumstances, without a parent or guardian present’. CLC further reiterated that ‘strip searches … can be intrusive, humiliating and harmful’. 


A 2025 RLC Report highlighted that over 10 years, NSW police conducted 82,471 strip searches, with 86.5% finding no illicit substances.


Arguments:

The UNSW Report concluded that police hold significant coercive authority over civilians, creating a ‘power imbalance between state and citizen’ that prevents the latter from truly giving consent. Dr Grewcock and Dr Sentas (2021) observed that strip searches can intimidate and humiliate individuals, compromising consent. Samantha Lee stated that while ‘it is not illegal to refuse [a] … strip search’, the imbalance of power means ‘the cards are stacked against the person who does not comply’. Paramount Law highlighted the District Court case of Attalla v State of NSW [2018], where Mr Attalla refused a strip search and was arrested for hindering police. According to Paramount Law, the court awarded damages to Attalla, citing the illegality of the arrest. 


The UNSW Report argued that strip searches are conducted without evidence of an immediate or serious threat to personal safety, having become ‘increasingly normalised’ in NSW. The RLC noted that they are designed to ‘be a last resort and not the first port of call’. However, the UNSW Report reported that police are ‘using strip searches routinely with little regard for the law.’ Grewcock and Sentas (2021) outlined that ‘there is a constant tension between the formal restrictions on police power imposed through mechanisms such as LEPRA and practice on the street’. According to the UNSW Report, this demonstrates that a reliance on consent contributes to practices extending beyond LEPRA’s legal limits.


RMIT Criminology Lecturer Peta Malins stated the overuse of strip searches undermines trust with young people and vulnerable groups, ‘causing significant and lasting trauma and harm.’ Samantha Lee noted police discretion creates a ‘pattern of proactive policing’ that disproportionately affects Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and young people. Lee further argued that such practices ‘inflicts ongoing trauma on many young people’. A 15-year-old boy who underwent a strip search at a Sydney music festival said he was ‘so nervous he was shaking’.


Advice/Solution Identification:

RLC, CLC and Dr Grewcock and Dr Sentas, have called for the prohibition of consent-based strip searches. In the UNSW Report, Dr Grewcock and Dr Sentas highlighted that amending the law would require police conducting strip searches to do so ‘in accordance with the [other] legal criteria’. They further stated that these amendments could provide greater clarity and transparency, and ‘increase police accountability.’


Precedent:

There is international precedent for removing consent as a justification for police strip searches. In Scotland, the police hold equivalent strip search powers. However, Citizens Advice Scotland noted that you can no longer be asked to give consent to be searched, and the police must have a warrant or show legally justifiable grounds to do so. 



Public Support: 


Broad Support:

  1. NSW Council for Civil Liberties - Called for broad reform for NSW strip search practices and endorsed the RLC-commissioned report by Dr Grewcock and Dr Sentas, without explicitly calling for this change.

  2. Sydney Criminal Lawyers - Criticised aspects of LEPRA, including the limitations for civilians declining to provide consent, but focused more on indications from drug detection dogs and did not explicitly call for this change.


The following legal experts were signatories to the RLC’s 2019 open letter to the NSW Police Minister outlining their concerns about the rise in the use and application of strip searches in NSW and the need for law reform:

  1. Elizabeth Evatt - AC Former Chief Justice of the Family Court and Former member of UN Human Rights Committee

  2. Jane Sanders - Principal Solicitor The Shopfront Youth Legal Centre

  3. Janelle Clarke - A/CEO Aboriginal Legal Service NSW/ACT Ltd

  4. Joanna Shulman - CEO Redfern Legal Centre

  5. George Newhouse - Director National Justice Project

  6. Nicholas Cowdery AM - QC Visiting Professional Fellow Faculty of Law UNSW

  7. Jonathon Hunyor CEO Public Interest Advocacy Centre

  8. Professor Eileen Baldry Professor of Criminology - University of NSW

  9. Tim Leach Executive Director Community Legal Centres NSW

  10. Andrew Stone SC NSW President  Australian Lawyers Alliance

  11. Helen Campbell OAM - Executive Officer Women’s Legal Service NSW

  12. Edwina MacDonald - Legal Director Human Rights Law Centre

  13. Professor David Dixon - Professor Faculty of Law University of NSW

  14. Malcolm Ramage QC - Forbes Chambers

  15. Vasili Maroulis - Managing Principal Solicitor Marrickville Legal Centre 

  16. Professor Gail Mason - Law School, University of Sydney

  17. Chris Figg - Director Ngiyani Pty Ltd

  18. Ramesh Rajalingam - Barrister Black Chambers

  19. Felicity Graham - Barrister Black Chambers

  20. Andrew Boe - Barrister Black Chambers

  21. Jane Titterington - Principal Solicitor Mid North Coast CLC 

  22. Peter O’Brien - Principal O’Brien Solicitors

  23. Anna Kerr - Principal Solicitor Feminist Legal Clinic Inc.

  24. Professor Jill Hunter - Faculty of Law UNSW

  25. Julie Stubbs - Centre for Crime Law and Justice UNSW

  26. Pearl Beaumont - Sole Practitioner

  27. Jane Bolitho - Senior Lecturer in Criminology UNSW

  28. Cara Feiner - Barrister, Black Chambers

  29. Vicki Harding - Centre Director, Inner City Legal Centre

  30. Helen Gibbon - Lecturer, Faculty of Law UNSW

  31. Dr Andy Kaladelfos - Lecturer in Criminology UNSW

  32. Professor Luke McNamara - Co-Director, Centre for Crime, Law and Justice Faculty of Law, UNSW   

  33. Melanie Schwartz - Senior Lecturer Faculty of Law, UNSW

  34. Mehera San Roque - Senior Lecturer Faculty of Law, UNSW

  35. Amanda Porter - Senior Lecturer Faculty of Law, UNSW

  36. Louise Boon-Kuo - Lecturer Law School University of Sydney

  37. Jane Moore Principal Jane Moore Lawyer & Mediator South Australia

  38. Professor Alex Steel Faculty of Law University of NSW  

  39. Annie Cossins - Professor of Law & Criminology Faculty of Law, UNSW  

  40. Dr Eugene Schofield-Georgeson - Lecturer, Faculty of Law University of Technology Sydney 

  41. Stephen Lawrence - Barrister Black Chambers  

  42. Hilary Kincaid - Principal Solicitor, Inner City Legal Centre   

  43. Ryan Coleiro - Clerk, Forbes Chambers 

  44. Michael Burke - Barrister, Forbes Chambers 

  45. Georgia Lewer - Barrister, Forbes Chambers 

  46. Emma Golledge - Director, Kingsford Legal Centre 

  47. Mark Patrick - Managing Principal, Solicitor Australian Centre for Disability Law  

  48. Stacy Treloar - Chief Executive Officer, Far West Community Legal Centre Ltd  

  49. Monique Hurley - Lawyer, Human Rights Law Centre  

  50. Robert Pelletier - Executive Officer, Macarthur Legal Centre  

  51. Associate Professor Tyrone Kirchengast - Law School University of Sydney  

  52. Ken Beilby - Principal Solicitor, Northern Rivers Community Legal Centre  

  53. Mark Grierson - Chief Executive Officer, Advocacy Law Alliance Inc  

  54. Truda Gray - Centre Coordinator, Illawarra Legal Centre  

  55. Arlia Fleming - Managing Principal Solicitor 

  56. Elizabeth Evatt - Community Legal Centre  

  57. Sabina Wynn - Director, Immigration Advice Rights Centre  

  58. Alexandra Stratigos - Principal Solicitor, HIV/AIDS Legal Centre  

  59. Nick Sabel - CEO, Western Sydney Community Legal Centre    

  60. Tara Ward - Executive Director/Lawyer, Animal Defenders Officer Inc.  

  61. Effi Vassiliadis - Acting Executive Officer, South West Sydney Legal Centre 


This list reflects publicly stated positions and should not necessarily be taken as endorsement of this specific brief.


News Coverage:

  • SBS - “NSW police won't review strip-searching policies despite reports of officers targeting Indigenous children”. The article reported on the disproportionate impact that strip searching practices are having on vulnerable communities, including First Nations People. By: Rachael Knowles | Wed 20 Mar 2024 - Read the article here.

  • The Guardian - “NSW urged to stop strip-searches of young people after court ruling spotlights police conduct”. Coverage of NSW Supreme Court ruling regarding the strip searching of young peopleBy: Jordyn Beazley | Thurs 02 Oct 2025 - Read the article here.

  • The Guardian - A police strip-search left a young woman feeling dehumanised. New data reveals the extent of the practice in NSW”. The article highlighted the number of strip searches taking place in NSW through the RLC’s police accountability dashboard. By: Catie McLeod | Wed 25 Sept 2024 - Read the article here.

  • ABC - “NSW Police who strip searched teens did not understand the law, inquiry finds”. The article reported on the initial findings by the LECC in its investigation into police strip search powers and emphasised the humiliating impacts of reported police conduct. By: Maddy King | Fri 08 May 2020 - Read the article here.


Where to go to learn more: 

  1. (2019) Rethinking Strip Searches by NSW Police | Dr Michael Grewcock and Dr Vicki Sentas, UNSW Law - Commissioned by RLC, this report investigated the ‘adequacy of the law regulating strip searches conducted by NSW Police’. By considering anecdotal evidence regarding the effects of strip searches, it provided recommendations for reform, including that strip searches should not be able to be conducted by consent. View the report here.

  2. (2020) Inquiry into NSW Police Force strip search practices | Law Enforcement Conduct Commission - Launched in 2018 following a number of complaints regarding police conduct, this inquiry provided investigations of NSW Police Force (NSWPF) strip search practices, and analysis of their policies and training. It provided a number of recommendations, including ensuring NSWPF meet threshold requirements under LEPRA regardless of consent. View the inquiry here.

  3. (2023) Abolishing Police Consent Searches Through Legislation: Lessons From Scotland | Josephine Ross - This academic journal article reflected on the removal of consent as a search justification in Scotland and its pro-social impacts, providing a useful precedent for NSW reform, despite its overseas context. View the journal article here.

  4. (2019) Open Letter to the NSW Police Minister on Strip Searches | Redfern Legal Centre and Community Organisations - This open letter called on the NSW Government to urgently reform police strip search practices following growing concerns regarding unlawful and traumatic searches, particularly affecting young people and vulnerable communities. The letter argued that police were routinely exceeding their powers under LEPRA and called for legislative reform. View the open letter here.

  5. Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW) - View the full Act here.


Human Perspective: 

CW: The following story contains details regarding police intimidation, strip searches, and degrading treatment, which may be distressing or triggering for survivors of sexual assault or police misconduct.


17-year-old Leo was standing in line to enter a NSW dance music festival when a drug detection dog sat down next to him. He was then directed by three police officers to a private enclosure containing a small canvas tent. The officers did not identify their rank, administer a caution or ask his age. Although he had no visible contraband after an initial search, one officer informed him that he should agree to a strip search or he faced potential charges of hindering police. Leo felt intimidated by the number of police present, so he offered a verbal ‘okay’ which the police recorded as consent. Inside the demountable tent, Leo was then instructed to remove his clothing for a visual inspection. The search included a request for him to squat while undressed. Officers also performed a visual inspection of his body parts, including his genital area, to look for hidden items. Ultimately, no illegal substances were discovered. Following the procedure, Leo was permitted to dress and return to the festival. While the physical encounter was brief, Leo felt significant humiliation and distress as a result of his interaction with the police. 


To protect the anonymity of those involved, this is a fictionalised account drawn from an amalgamation of real-life stories, experiences and testimonials gathered during the research process for this brief. Any resemblance to actual individuals is purely coincidental.


Conflict of interest/acknowledgment statement: 

N/A


Support 

If your organisation would like to add your support to this paper or suggest amendments, please email Info@foreaustralia.com


Disclaimers

Please review all FORE disclaimers here.


Reference list: 

Community Legal Centres NSW. (n.d.). Discretion and discrimination: Rethinking strip searches. https://www.clcnsw.org.au/discretion-and-discrimination-rethinking-strip-searches


Community Legal Centres NSW. (n.d.). Rethinking strip searches in NSW.

https://www.clcnsw.org.au/rethinking-strip-searches-nsw


Grewcock, M., & Sentas, V. (2021). Strip Searches, Police Power and the Infliction of Harm: An Analysis of the New South Wales Strip Search Regime. Crime Justice Journal, 10(3), 191-206. https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/1665/1092


Grewcock, M., & Sentas, V. (2019). Rethinking Strip Searches by NSW Police Report. University of New South Wales. https://rlc.org.au/sites/default/files/attachments/Rethinking-strip-searches-by-NSW-Police-web.pdf


Gregoire, P., & Nedim, U. (2024, April 3). Is It Illegal to Refuse a Strip Search in NSW? Sydney Criminal Lawyers. https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/is-it-illegal-to-refuse-a-strip-search-in-nsw/


Law Enforcement Conduct Commission. (2020). Review of NSW Police Force Standard Operating Procedures for strip searches in custody. https://www.lecc.nsw.gov.au/publications/publications/review-of-strip-search-sops-january-2020.pdf?expand=actions,breadcrumbs,navigation&expand.navigation.depth=2


Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW)

https://legislation.nsw.gov.au/view/whole/html/inforce/current/act-2002-103 


Malins, P. (2019, December 7). Strip-searches are a form of state-sanctioned violence that must stop. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/dec/07/strip-searches-are-a-form-of-state-sanctioned-violence-that-must-stop#:~:text=The%20potential%20for,strip%2Dsearch%20practices


Redfern Legal Centre. (2025, July). The Use of Strip Searches & Drug Dogs in NSW. 

https://rlc.org.au/sites/default/files/2025-07/The%20Use%20of%20Strip%20Searches%20and%20Drug%20Dogs%20in%20NSW.pdf




Comments


Follow us on Instagram

Make a difference

Change starts with people like you. Your donation helps make a real impact, one action at a time. Together, we can do more.

Frequency

One time

Weekly

Monthly

Yearly

Amount

$5

$10

$20

$50

$100

Other

0/100

Comment (optional)

Got an Idea?

We're always looking for expert-led, evidence-based solutions to explore.

 

If you have an idea you think we should look into, share a few quick details:​

Otherwise email: info@foreaustralia.com

Fuel your impact every FOREtnight

Concise, expert-backed solutions delivered straight to your inbox.

FORE Good

Reach Out to FORE Good Ltd

info@foreaustralia.com

Media contact:

Lucy Skelton - lucy@foreaustralia.com

Disclaimers

Content Guidelines

ACN: 697 013 988

ABN: 48 697 013 988

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

FORE Good would like to acknowledge Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Custodians of the land we live, learn, and work on.​

 

We value their cultures, identities, and continuing connection to country, waters, kin, and community. We pay our respects to Elders, both past and present, and are committed to supporting the next generation of young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leaders. This always was and always will be Aboriginal land.

 

As an organisation dedicated to amplifying solutions, we recognise that First Nations peoples have long identified many of the pathways for environmental protection and meeting community needs. Our role is to listen, support, and amplify these voices.

14_edited_edited.png
bottom of page